<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22600764</id><updated>2011-12-14T18:54:18.961-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Brrreeeporting</title><subtitle type='html'>Just a quickly set up blog to cash in on the fad...
or is it?</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://brrreeeporting.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22600764/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://brrreeeporting.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Your House Abroad</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15218467995893943237</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>4</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22600764.post-114051172611532320</id><published>2006-02-21T00:43:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-21T00:54:44.440-08:00</updated><title type='text'>brrreeeport - the party's over</title><content type='html'>brrreeeport is dying now - unsurprisingly. The most interesting thing for me is the watch of how many pages are returned in Google, MSN, Yahoo. It look's like&lt;br /&gt;Microsoft's search has fared worst of all. A spectacular own goal for Scoble! Latest figures are at:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;A href=http://www.brrreeeport.co.uk &gt; www.brrreeeport.co.uk &lt;/A&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22600764-114051172611532320?l=brrreeeporting.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://brrreeeporting.blogspot.com/feeds/114051172611532320/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22600764&amp;postID=114051172611532320' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22600764/posts/default/114051172611532320'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22600764/posts/default/114051172611532320'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://brrreeeporting.blogspot.com/2006/02/brrreeeport-partys-over.html' title='brrreeeport - the party&apos;s over'/><author><name>Your House Abroad</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15218467995893943237</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22600764.post-114029800036152757</id><published>2006-02-18T13:19:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-19T00:29:07.286-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Call me a cynic but ...</title><content type='html'>Call me a cynic but given that the person (Scoble) who told us all to use Brrreeeport in our posts seems to be having some sort of launch part for his book `Naked Conversations' at almost the same time. Wow, what a coincidence - lots of links, visitors and hype just in time for the book release. Coincidence?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Was it worth setting up this site?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;A href=http://www.brrreeeport.co.uk &gt; www.Brrreeeport.co.uk &lt;/A&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Probably not!&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22600764-114029800036152757?l=brrreeeporting.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://brrreeeporting.blogspot.com/feeds/114029800036152757/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22600764&amp;postID=114029800036152757' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22600764/posts/default/114029800036152757'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22600764/posts/default/114029800036152757'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://brrreeeporting.blogspot.com/2006/02/call-me-cynic-but.html' title='Call me a cynic but ...'/><author><name>Your House Abroad</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15218467995893943237</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22600764.post-114021874152497928</id><published>2006-02-17T15:03:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-17T15:33:44.590-08:00</updated><title type='text'>"Brrreeeport" 977 = approx 51,000</title><content type='html'>977 = approx 51,000&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Wow - that's a pretty crude approximation!&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;I have just (23:15 GMT) typed "brrreeeport" into Google and 977 is the actual number of pages (including similar pages) in the index, whereas 51,000 is the estimated number of pages. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Earlier today (18:53GMT)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;977 = approx 23,100&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The error has risen from over 2000% to over 5000% which is all spectacularly bad!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How do Google estimate their total number of pages on a search word? I guess it's a secret, but could it be based on some crude temporal extrapolation? Perhaps this has gone so wrong here because of the unusual speed in which the word is entering the pages of the internet? I'd like to assume that other searches are better estimated than this on Google - surely they must be, but I'm never really checked. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Yahoo and MSN seem much more accurate in estimating the total number of searches for this particular keyword. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It will be interesting to see how the quality of the search engine rankings pan out over the next few days. Drawing the line between spam and no spam will be virtully impossible - you could class it all as spam, or none of it, or something inbetween.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;A href=http://www.brrreeeport.co.uk &gt; Also see: http://www.brrreeeport.co.uk &lt;/A&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22600764-114021874152497928?l=brrreeeporting.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://brrreeeporting.blogspot.com/feeds/114021874152497928/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22600764&amp;postID=114021874152497928' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22600764/posts/default/114021874152497928'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22600764/posts/default/114021874152497928'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://brrreeeporting.blogspot.com/2006/02/brrreeeport-977-approx-51000.html' title='&quot;Brrreeeport&quot; 977 = approx 51,000'/><author><name>Your House Abroad</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15218467995893943237</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22600764.post-114018578445118018</id><published>2006-02-17T06:13:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-17T09:53:24.903-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Brrreeeport !</title><content type='html'>Amateur webmasters are furiously trying to&lt;br /&gt;think of ways to use the word Brrreeeport in&lt;br /&gt;their blogs. It's not difficult! This has to &lt;br /&gt;be a flash in the pan, but an interesting &lt;br /&gt;one at that. Hmmm....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Some further info? &lt;A href=http://www.brrreeeport.co.uk &gt; http://www.brrreeeport.co.uk &lt;/A&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;oh and what are we really interested in ...?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.Yourhouseabroad.com &gt; www.YourhouseAbroad: Holiday Homes Abroad &lt;/A&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22600764-114018578445118018?l=brrreeeporting.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://brrreeeporting.blogspot.com/feeds/114018578445118018/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22600764&amp;postID=114018578445118018' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22600764/posts/default/114018578445118018'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22600764/posts/default/114018578445118018'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://brrreeeporting.blogspot.com/2006/02/brrreeeport.html' title='Brrreeeport !'/><author><name>Your House Abroad</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15218467995893943237</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
